Oct 16

PALO ALTO, Calif.–"The stream of information coming at you can be overwhelming," Facebook Chief Operating Officer Sheryl Sandberg said when asked in an onstage interview what she thinks of social-networking fatigue. "I think people sometimes feel uncomfortable hitting ‘ignore’ (on friend requests), but if you don’t want to connect to someone, that’s why it’s there."

Facebook, after all, is on top of the world. It doesn’t make much difference to the health of that 300 million-member user base if your "social graph" is one degree smaller.

Sandberg, who joined Facebook a year and a half ago after a high-ranking sales job at Google, was interviewed Thursday at the Palo Alto Research Center auditorium by industry analyst Charlene Li. The event had been organized by Silicon Valley networking group The Churchill Club.

Since then, she has become the company’s foremost evangelist for some of its most prominent marketing pitches: the power of connectivity, and how Facebook can give businesses a more authentic face. Sandberg had given the talk in New York to debut "BrandLift," the social network’s partnership with statistics firm Nielsen to provide audience response to advertisements.

Li’s questions for Sandberg weren’t particular hard balls. Rather, the interview followed Sandberg’s usual talking points for a corporate audience: how Facebook is an unparalleled and unprecedented hub for communication and interaction, and how in turn it has changed marketing and communication–and that there’s no other place on the Web for advertisers to get that kind of interaction with consumers.

"There are other places on the Web where you can get reach and audience. Certainly Yahoo offers that…What we have is deep engagement," Sandberg said. "We are by far the place where people spend the most time on the Web. On average, a monthly user on Facebook spends 5.75 hours on the site. No. 2 is Yahoo, and they are at 3 hours and 23 minutes. That is a really big gap."

(Ouch, Yahoo.)

Facebook might be "a marketer’s heaven," as Li put it, but Sandberg said it also takes user privacy seriously–another regular and understandable Facebook talking point, considering it’s had the occasional privacy snafu in which user backlash has reached a fever pitch.

"Why is our usage exploding, as some of the other social properties are decreasing?" Sandberg asked rhetorically, not explicitly mentioning MySpace, which recent numbers showed has seen much of its traffic eaten up by Facebook’s. "We think it’s because we made it really safe." She talked about how one of the first things she learned from CEO Mark Zuckerberg was the high number of members who put their cell phone numbers on their profiles. "Facebook is that safe," Sandberg said. "And so we take user privacy as the most important thing we do."

It obviously hopes to continue to get bigger. The company is working on "a deep integration with mobile carriers" to reach audiences that may have access to mobile devices but not PCs, and recently launched its Facebook Lite site "if you are in a country with slow bandwidth and slow loading times…we really wanted to speed it up."

Are advertisers warming up as Facebook’s membership skyrockets? "They certainly get it more than they did a year ago," Sandberg said–and indeed, Madison Avenue didn’t warm up to Facebook immediately, amid reports that social-network advertising was difficult to harness and even more difficult to profit from. "We’re growing our users, and that’s helping us a lot, and our ad products have improved tremendously…in a tough economy, advertisers and marketers are looking for value."

At least according to the Valley tech press, the biggest threat to Facebook’s dominance these days isn’t coming from Microsoft or Google, but from upstart Twitter–which Facebook famously tried to purchase and was snubbed.

She reiterated that while both Facebook and Twitter are "part of the same movement…real-time information shared quickly," that there’s room in the field for more than one player and that competition is positive.

She said, though, that she hasn’t jumped on the Twitter bandwagon because of what she considers an important differentiation between the two services.

"I don’t use it very frequently. I’ve put, like, two or three tweets up ever," Sandberg said. "I’m not trying to broadcast to the world, I’m trying to share with my friends. It’s not what I want to do. Twitter’s much more of a broadcast-to-everyone kind of thing."

Tagged with:
Sep 24

PALO ALTO, Calif.–Facebook has unleashed a Tornado, and it’s hoping that some eager engineers will go catch it.

Earlier this month, Facebook released the open-source Web server framework called Tornado, which powers the real-time streaming behind its latest toy, social feed aggregator FriendFeed. And on Wednesday evening at the office that most recently housed the FBFund incubator program, senior open programs manager David Recordon and director of products Bret Taylor held a "tech talk" to pitch Tornado to a crowd of several dozen interested members of the Web development community.

"We had actually been planning on open-sourcing (Tornado)" prior to Facebook’s acquisition of FriendFeed, said Taylor, who had served as CEO of the start-up. "When we got to Facebook we thought it was a really good opportunity to do it."

The slant of Wednesday evening’s talk (which was quite technical, so I won’t be going into significant detail): if you’re dealing with real-time, streaming content, Facebook thinks Tornado is for you. And if you’ve been listening to anything that Facebook has been saying recently, it believes the real-time Web is the future for everyone–not just its own company.

"FriendFeed’s a real-time system," Taylor said as he described how the Python-based Tornado framework’s non-blocking nature was ideal for real-time Web services. "Essentially, every active user of FriendFeed maintains an open connection to the FriendFeed servers."

Both Recordon and Taylor are recent arrivals at Facebook: Recordon joined Facebook last month as its resident open-source guru, and the company had acquired FriendFeed a few weeks earlier in a deal that brought on board both a top-notch engineering team (its founders, including Taylor, were Google veterans) and cutting-edge technology for amassing and indexing real-time Web conversations–so cutting-edge, in fact, that it was unclear as to how the mainstream would ever actually accept it.

At the time, there were questions about what, exactly, Facebook would actually do with FriendFeed. In the meantime it’s become clear that acquiring the would-be Twitter rival allowed Facebook to leap ahead with some of its development of new, real-time-focused features as well as to enhance existing ones with FriendFeed’s technology and brainpower.

Open-sourcing the technology doesn’t have an obvious financial end for Facebook. But it will ideally mean that some of the developer community will be marching to Facebook’s beat, at a time when the company continues to compete with the far smaller Twitter for a majority share of what’s come to be known as the real-time Web.

As for its Python foundations, Taylor said that FriendFeed had been looking to build Tornado in a manner "sophisticated enough that we could do all the things we wanted but well known enough so that a new engineer could theoretically understand our code base right away…Python has a lot of its flaws, I wish it had real inline functions like Javascript, but for all of its flaws it’s actually pretty nice to use in practice."

Taylor told me afterward that no concrete plans have been put into action as to which Facebook features may be getting a FriendFeed makeover (so as to speak) but hinted that one getting talked about for some enhancement from the former FriendFeed team is Facebook Chat, the site’s instant messaging client, because of its obviously real-time nature.

Tornado isn’t the first technology that Facebook, still criticized by some of the open-source community for its heavy reliance on proprietary technology and a login wall, has released as open-source code: well over a year ago, the company released the code for a significant portion of its developer platform.

Tagged with:
Sep 13

As expected, Facebook is slimming down. The new "Lite" version of Facebook is available for users in the United States and India, according to TechCrunch.

The new version of the site appears to be much cleaner and simpler. It appears, at a quick glance, to be a better site for Facebook newbies or for anyone who finds the current site overwhelming or noisy. It also pushes the old-school Facebook apps off a cliff, which is just as well for the newest Facebook-connected services. Try it at lite.facebook.com.

The major visual change in Facebook Lite, compared Facebook "Classic," is simply that most of the the navigation and info page that was on the left of the page is now gone. The user is not distracted by the mostly superfluous details that resided there. The input box is also gone, replaced by buttons (Write, Post Photos, Post Video) that pop down the actual input forms only when needed.

The new layout feels simpler and faster, almost Twitter-like.

The new Lite version of Facebook is cleaner and faster.

(Credit: Screenshot by Rafe Needleman/CNET)

Facebook "Classic" has a lot of navigational elements and more data that make the site cluttlered, in comparison.

(Credit: Screenshot by Rafe Needleman/CNET)

Other tweaks that diehards might notice: the "Friends" tab in the top navigation of Facebook Classic is missing in Facebook Lite, replaced by a new "Events" link that opens up a page of invitations.

All pages on the site seem to be affected. They are simpler, easier to read, and faster. They load faster, partly due to what appears to be HTML optimization at Facebook. My profile page in Facebook Lite weighed in at 11K, compared to 44K in the Classic version. However, the smaller pages may also come courtesy of a dramatically decreased advertising load, which I doubt we can count on continuing, once Facebook Lite enters the mainstream.

I like the Lite site more than the old Facebook and am moving over to it now. Nice job, Facebook.

Tagged with:
Aug 22

On Thursday night, Facebook announced that it’s launched its first official Twitter app–sort of. In a post on the company blog, Facebook announced that updates to "fan pages," public profiles for celebrities, brands, organizations, and what-have-you, can now be sent out through Twitter.

"Public figures, musicians, businesses and organizations of all types who’ve created Facebook Pages often want to share a status update, a photo or an event with as many of their supporters as possible," the post by Facebook employee Michael Gummelt read. "Celebrities may want to share personal news or charities may want to put out calls for help to both their Facebook fans and their Twitter followers, all at the same time."

This is basically something that many blogging and publishing services already do: offer a way to automatically syndicate a short blurb and a link onto Twitter. It’s a no-brainer. But Facebook and Twitter have a complicated history. Facebook attempted to acquire Twitter last year, and Twitter turned the offer down. Then, earlier this summer, Facebook did acquire FriendFeed, a social-network aggregator that failed to gain mainstream traction but pioneered many of the real-time, streaming features that are now central to both Facebook and Twitter.

Relations between the two companies still seem to be a bit shaky. Facebook continues to roll out Twitter-inspired features like a souped-up search engine, a revamped "publisher" tool that can make status updates selectively public, and soon a stripped down "Facebook Lite" site that looks quite a bit like the ultra-basic Twitter.

Much has been said about Facebook and Twitter as the two forces vying for control of the real-time social Web, but little light has been shed on just how central a role the marketing industry has. The fact that Facebook’s first Twitter app is exclusively for its brand-marketing "fan pages" highlights this. In the digital marketing world, the buzzworthy place for brands to be right now is Twitter–especially since this week Twitter started to elaborate plans for the paid accounts it’s going to offer to businesses by the end of the year. If Facebook is going to continue to court brands effectively, it has to offer a quick and easy way to plug into that all-important "Twitter strategy."

What’s less clear is whether Facebook will let ordinary users syndicate their profile updates to Twitter. Currently, they can bring in plenty of data from elsewhere thanks to Facebook’s third-party developer API. You can import a Twitter feed into Facebook status updates or use third-party clients like TweetDeck to update Twitter status and Facebook status simultaneously, but you still can’t opt to publish your Facebook profile updates elsewhere.

Tagged with:
preload preload preload